> Michael Behe
> William Dembski
> Guillermo Gonzalez
> Steve Meyer
> Paul Nelson
> Jay Richards
> Jonathan Wells
> Jonathan Witt



Send an email to us at:
idthefuture@discovery.org



> "A Matter of Dismal Wet Plops": Stephen Meyer Interviews David Berlinski on Darwinism
> Deepening Darwin's Dilemma With Jonathan Wells
> Alfred Russel Wallace: Champion of Natural Selection or Intelligent Design?
> Is the Cell Like a Computer?
> Moving the Goalpost: How Darwin's Theory Survives
> Meyer and Dembski Breakthroughs Top ID Science Stories for 2009
> Biomimetics, Peppered Moths, and Ardi: The Top Ten Darwin and Design Science Stories for 2009
> Critics Fail in Attempts to Attack Irreducible Complexity: The Top Darwin and Design Science Stories for 2009
> Rodney LeVake: Expelled Science Teacher, Part 1
> Biomimetics and the Positive Implications for Intelligent Design

Dotted Divider Line

« Alfred Russel Wallace: Champion of Natural Selection or Intelligent Design? | Main | "A Matter of Dismal Wet Plops": Stephen Meyer Interviews David Berlinski on Darwinism »

Deepening Darwin's Dilemma With Jonathan Wells

play_button.gif Click here to listen.

This episode of ID the Future features biologist and Discovery Institute Senior Fellow Jonathan Wells, who explains why Darwin saw the Cambrian explosion as a serious argument against his theory. Darwin countered it by supposing that fossils of the ancestors of Cambrian animals once existed, but were destroyed.

Listen in and learn how the discovery of microscopic and soft-bodied Precambrian fossils makes Darwin’s excuse sound hollow.

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.discovery.org/scripts/mt/mt-tb.cgi/30311