Send an email to us at:
idthefuture@discovery.org



> William Dembski's Advice for Young Intelligent Design Scientists
> The Best Way to Teach Evolution: Treat It Like Science
> Caroline Crocker Explains the Need for Scientific Integrity
> The Real Story of How Caroline Crocker Was Expelled from George Mason University
> Evidence for Intelligent Design
> ID The Future Video Podcast: Biological Information and the Origin of Life featuring Dr. Stephen Meyer
> Setting the Record Straight with Caroline Crocker
> The Design Argument Is Unrefuted: Stephen Meyer Responds to Critics In Signature in the Cell, Part 4
> DNA Evidence for Design: Stephen C. Meyer and Signature in the Cell, Part 3
> Delving Into Science at Cambridge: Stephen C. Meyer and Signature in the Cell, Part 2

Dotted Divider Line

« Academic Freedom Update: California Science Center Engaged in Illegal Cover-Up | Main | Biomimetics and the Positive Implications for Intelligent Design »

New Peer-Reviewed Paper Demolishes Fallacious Objection to ID
Anika Smith

play_button.gif Click here to listen.

On this episode of ID the Future, Casey Luskin examines a new peer-reviewed paper that demolishes a very common and very fallacious objection to intelligent design. That objection? "Aren't there vast eons of time for evolution?"

For more information on this and other peer-reviewed papers relating to intelligent design, visit Evolution News & Views at www.evolutionnews.org.

Posted by Anika Smith on January 7, 2010 12:27 PM |

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.idthefuture.com/scripts/mt/mt-tb.cgi/29381