> Michael Behe
> William Dembski
> Guillermo Gonzalez
> Steve Meyer
> Paul Nelson
> Jay Richards
> Jonathan Wells
> Jonathan Witt



Send an email to us at:
idthefuture@discovery.org



> Biomimetics and the Positive Implications for Intelligent Design
> New Peer-Reviewed Paper Demolishes Fallacious Objection to ID
> Academic Freedom Update: California Science Center Engaged in Illegal Cover-Up
> 200 Years After Darwin -- What Didn't Darwin Know?
> Why Consensus Doesn't Count
> Scientocracy Rules
> Information Theory: George Gilder at Bar-Ilan University
> The Design of Life: What the Evidence of Biological Systems Reveals
> Has the U.S. Supreme Court Sanctioned Critique of Darwinism?
> What Do Court Decisions Say About Teaching Evolution?

Dotted Divider Line

« Academic Freedom Update: California Science Center Engaged in Illegal Cover-Up | Main | Biomimetics and the Positive Implications for Intelligent Design »

New Peer-Reviewed Paper Demolishes Fallacious Objection to ID
Anika Smith

play_button.gif Click here to listen.

On this episode of ID the Future, Casey Luskin examines a new peer-reviewed paper that demolishes a very common and very fallacious objection to intelligent design. That objection? “Aren’t there vast eons of time for evolution?”

For more information on this and other peer-reviewed papers relating to intelligent design, visit Evolution News & Views at www.evolutionnews.org.

Posted by Anika Smith on January 7, 2010 12:27 PM |

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.discovery.org/scripts/mt/mt-tb.cgi/29381