Send an email to us at:
idthefuture@discovery.org



> Caroline Crocker Explains the Need for Scientific Integrity
> The Real Story of How Caroline Crocker Was Expelled from George Mason University
> Evidence for Intelligent Design
> ID The Future Video Podcast: Biological Information and the Origin of Life featuring Dr. Stephen Meyer
> Setting the Record Straight with Caroline Crocker
> The Design Argument Is Unrefuted: Stephen Meyer Responds to Critics In Signature in the Cell, Part 4
> DNA Evidence for Design: Stephen C. Meyer and Signature in the Cell, Part 3
> Delving Into Science at Cambridge: Stephen C. Meyer and Signature in the Cell, Part 2
> The Making of an ID Theorist: Stephen C. Meyer and the Origin of Life
> Advancing Understanding of Intelligent Design in the Spanish Speaking Community Worldwide

Dotted Divider Line

« Top 10 Darwin and Design Resources from 2008 | Main | The Making of a Darwin Dissenter Part II »

Intelligent Design's Implications Don't Discredit Its Scientific Merit: Opposing Views, Part 3
Anika Smith

play_button.gif Click here to listen.

On this episode of ID the Future, Casey Luskin explains why any philosophical implications of intelligent design, or any religious motives, beliefs, and affiliations of ID proponents, do not disqualify ID from having scientific merit.

This podcast is taken from a series of articles published at OpposingViews.com and can be read here.

Posted by Anika Smith on January 8, 2009 3:49 PM |

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.idthefuture.com/scripts/mt/mt-tb.cgi/14231