ID the Future Intelligent Design, Evolution, and Science Podcast

IDTF-thumbnail
IDTF-thumbnail

Mind over Matter: Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder and the Implications for Materialism

On this episode of ID the Future, UCLA psychiatrist Jeffrey Schwartz shares with Casey Luskin about his research on obsessive compulsive disorder (OCD). What does neuroscience tell us about the relationship between the mind and the brain? Schwartz explains in his book, The Mind and the Brain, that patients treated for OCD actually had the power to change the neural pathways in their brains by the power of their minds. What does this mean for materialism in medicine? Listen in and discover the real-world implications in this debate.

IDTF-thumbnail
IDTF-thumbnail

Materialism and Human Dignity

On this episode of ID the Future, Casey Luskin interviews Michael Egnor, professor of neurosurgery at SUNY, Stony Brook, on the relationship between the mind and the brain.

Read More ›
IDTF-thumbnail
IDTF-thumbnail

Report From the Texas State Board of Education

In this ID the Future podcast, Casey Luskin interviews Jonathan Saenz, Esq., Director of Legislative Affairs & Attorney at the Free Market Foundation in Austin Texas. Mr. Saenz attended this week’s recent meeting of the Texas State Board of Education where members of the public expressed their views on whether Texas public schools should teach students about both the scientific strengths and weaknesses of evolution. Mr. Saenz recounts the predictably false and fallacious arguments made by many Darwinists who tried to convince the Texas State Board of Education to dumb-down evolution education.

Read More ›
IDTF-thumbnail
IDTF-thumbnail

Atheist Philosopher of Physics Bradley Monton on Intelligent Design Debate, Part Five

This episode of ID the Future features the last in a series of interviews with atheist philosopher of physics Bradley Monton. Professor Monton’s perspective enriches and expands the debate over intelligent design, as he discusses whether an ID proponent can be an atheist, the scientific evidence for intelligent design, and the importance of the argument from cosmology.

Read More ›
IDTF-thumbnail
IDTF-thumbnail

Atheist Philosopher of Physics Bradley Monton on Intelligent Design Debate, Part Four

On this episode of ID the Future, atheist philosopher of science Bradley Monton turns the tables on Casey Luskin, putting the question to him about the Dover trial. What is the story of Discovery Institute’s involvement in that infamous case? Listen in as Professor Monton asks good questions and gets good answers.

IDTF-thumbnail
IDTF-thumbnail

Atheist Philosopher of Physics Bradley Monton on Intelligent Design Debate, Part Three

On this episode of ID the Future, Casey Luskin continues his interview with atheist philosopher of science Bradley Monton. Professor Monton discusses his role in “The Great Debate on Intelligent Design” last weekend. Interestingly, the two presenters on the pro-ID side, including Prof. Monton, were non-theists.

Read More ›
IDTF-thumbnail
IDTF-thumbnail

The Importance of Being Human

This episode of ID the Future we’re highlighting a new podcast by Discovery Institute senior fellow Wesley J. Smith, called What It Means to Be Human.

Read More ›
IDTF-thumbnail
IDTF-thumbnail

Atheist Philosopher of Physics Bradley Monton on Intelligent Design Debate, Part Two

This episode of ID the Future features the second part of Casey Luskin’s interview with atheist philosopher of physics Bradley Monton.

Prof. Monton shares his experience in the debate over intelligent design and discusses the Dover decision, rebutting trial witness philosopher Robert Pennock.

Read More ›
IDTF-thumbnail
IDTF-thumbnail

Atheist Philosopher of Physics Bradley Monton on Intelligent Design Debate, Part One

This episode of ID the Future features part one of Casey Luskin’s interview with atheist philosopher of physics Bradley Monton, author of a new book on intelligent design. Prof. Monton has a unique perspective of the debate over intelligent design as an atheist who is trying to elevate the debate.

Read More ›