> Michael Behe
> William Dembski
> Guillermo Gonzalez
> Steve Meyer
> Paul Nelson
> Jay Richards
> Jonathan Wells
> Jonathan Witt



Send an email to us at:
idthefuture@discovery.org



> Does Evolution Have Any Practical Benefits for Science?
> Why Do Some Scientists Oppose ID?
> Are Humans Biological Accidents?
> Three Things to Know about Intelligent Design
> Is ID Creationism? William Dembski Answers Top Three Objections to ID
> William Dembski on the Origin of Life, Early Church Fathers, and Understanding ID
> Seeing Spots: Dr. Cornelius Hunter and Science's Blind Spot
> The Mystery of Life's Origin: An Interview with Dr. Charles Thaxton, Part Two
> Neo-Darwinism's Homology Problem
> The Mystery of Life's Origin: An Interview with Dr. Charles Thaxton, Part One

Dotted Divider Line

« Are Humans Biological Accidents? | Main | Does Evolution Have Any Practical Benefits for Science? »

Why Do Some Scientists Oppose ID?

play_button.gif Click here to listen.

In this episode of ID the Future, Casey Luskin explains why many scientists oppose intelligent design. He argues that most of the objections to ID rest on false caricatures and misunderstandings of the theory. Is ID just a negative argument against evolution? Does ID necessarily appeal to a God-of-the-Gaps? Is ID an attempt to disguise theology as science? Listen as Casey addresses these questions and shows how ID is a positive and scientific argument that infers the best explanation: intelligent design.

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.discovery.org/scripts/mt/mt-tb.cgi/8911