Send an email to us at:
idthefuture@discovery.org



> William Dembski's Advice for Young Intelligent Design Scientists
> The Best Way to Teach Evolution: Treat It Like Science
> Caroline Crocker Explains the Need for Scientific Integrity
> The Real Story of How Caroline Crocker Was Expelled from George Mason University
> Evidence for Intelligent Design
> ID The Future Video Podcast: Biological Information and the Origin of Life featuring Dr. Stephen Meyer
> Setting the Record Straight with Caroline Crocker
> The Design Argument Is Unrefuted: Stephen Meyer Responds to Critics In Signature in the Cell, Part 4
> DNA Evidence for Design: Stephen C. Meyer and Signature in the Cell, Part 3
> Delving Into Science at Cambridge: Stephen C. Meyer and Signature in the Cell, Part 2

Dotted Divider Line

« William Dembski on the Origin of Life, Early Church Fathers, and Understanding ID | Main | Three Things to Know about Intelligent Design »

Is ID Creationism? William Dembski Answers Top Three Objections to ID

play_button.gif Click here to listen.

On this episode of ID the Future, Casey Luskin continues an interview with leading intelligent design theorist and CSC Senior Fellow William Dembski. Together, Dembski and Luskin address the three most common objections to design: that it is improper to infer design based on unlikely probabilities, that dysfunctional or suboptimal biological structures disprove that they were designed, and that intelligent design is nothing more than repacked creationism.

Touching on such topics like pattern detection, design constraints, philosopher Immanuel Kant, and theology, Dembski shows that there are logical and reasonable answers to these objections and that intelligent design is a useful and scientific theory.

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.idthefuture.com/scripts/mt/mt-tb.cgi/8671