> Michael Behe
> William Dembski
> Guillermo Gonzalez
> Steve Meyer
> Paul Nelson
> Jay Richards
> Jonathan Wells
> Jonathan Witt



Send an email to us at:
idthefuture@discovery.org



> Delving Into Science at Cambridge: Stephen C. Meyer and Signature in the Cell, Part 2
> The Making of an ID Theorist: Stephen C. Meyer and the Origin of Life
> Matter and the Mind: Part Three With UK Darwin-Doubter James LeFanu
> Rediscovering the Mystery of Ourselves: Part Two With Science Writer James LeFanu
> Darwin Doubting in the UK: Columnist, Doctor and Author James LeFanu
> PSSI International Adventures With Darwinists in Spain, Part Two
> Physicians and Surgeons for Scientific Integrity, Part One
> When Athens Met Jerusalem With John Mark Reynolds
> Benjamin Wiker on Darwin, the Man and the Myth
> The Line Through the Heart: Natural Law and J. Budziszewski

Dotted Divider Line

« William Dembski on the Origin of Life, Early Church Fathers, and Understanding ID | Main | Three Things to Know about Intelligent Design »

Is ID Creationism? William Dembski Answers Top Three Objections to ID

play_button.gif Click here to listen.

On this episode of ID the Future, Casey Luskin continues an interview with leading intelligent design theorist and CSC Senior Fellow William Dembski. Together, Dembski and Luskin address the three most common objections to design: that it is improper to infer design based on unlikely probabilities, that dysfunctional or suboptimal biological structures disprove that they were designed, and that intelligent design is nothing more than repacked creationism.

Touching on such topics like pattern detection, design constraints, philosopher Immanuel Kant, and theology, Dembski shows that there are logical and reasonable answers to these objections and that intelligent design is a useful and scientific theory.

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.discovery.org/scripts/mt/mt-tb.cgi/8671