> Michael Behe
> William Dembski
> Guillermo Gonzalez
> Steve Meyer
> Paul Nelson
> Jay Richards
> Jonathan Wells
> Jonathan Witt



Send an email to us at:
idthefuture@discovery.org



> The Universe: Meaningful or Meaningless?
> Modeling Evolution With Stylus: Part Two
> Modeling Evolution With Stylus
> Irreducibly Complex: Behe on the Bacterial Flagellum
> Rebutting Methodological Materialism: Interview With Angus Menuge, Part Two
> Agents Under Fire: Part One With Angus Menuge
> Does Evolution Have Any Practical Benefits for Science?
> Why Do Some Scientists Oppose ID?
> Are Humans Biological Accidents?
> Three Things to Know about Intelligent Design

Dotted Divider Line

« Banned Item of the Year | Main | Rebecca Keller: Challenging Ideas Promotes Good Science »

Was Justice Denied to FTE during the Dover Intelligent Design Trial?

play_button.gif Click here to listen.

On this episode of ID The Future we're featuring an interview by CSC public policy officer Casey Luskin with Seth Cooper (himself an attorney and former public policy officer with the CSC) about strange sordid tale of the mistreatment of the Foundation for Thought & Ethics throughout the Dover intelligent design trial. Next month PBS will air a NOVA mockumentary that alleges to tell the true story about the Dover trial. Knowing PBS' past record on the issue of evolution and intelligent design it is unlikely that they will tell the whole story. Here then is one important piece to be aware of.

Seth Cooper is the co-author of an article entitled, "A Textbook Case of Judicial Activism: How a Pro-ID Publisher Was Denied its Day in Court," which describes how the publisher of the textbook Of Pandas and People, Foundation for Thought and Ethics (FTE), was denied the right to become a party to the Kitzmiller trial despite the fact that its intellectual property rights were implicated in the lawsuit.

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.discovery.org/scripts/mt/mt-tb.cgi/3124