> Michael Behe
> William Dembski
> Guillermo Gonzalez
> Steve Meyer
> Paul Nelson
> Jay Richards
> Jonathan Wells
> Jonathan Witt



Send an email to us at:
idthefuture@discovery.org



> How David Berlinski Became a Scientific Critic
> The Religious Foundations of Darwinism and the Failure of Naturalism
> Intelligently Designed Nanotechnology
> Darwin's Predictions With Cornelius Hunter
> In a Charitable Mood: David Berlinski Reviews Richard Dawkins' The Greatest Show on Earth
> The Real Frankenstein: Giovanni Aldini
> Darwinists Launch Cyber Attack on Intelligent Design Conference Website
> David Berlinski and The Deniable Darwin
> The Origins of Intelligent Design: Countering Darwinist Urban Legends
> A Skeptic's Take on the New Atheists: An Interview With The Devil's Delusion Author David Berlinski

Dotted Divider Line

« Failed Predictions and Common Descent: Part IV | Main | New Textbook Promotes Better Teaching of Evolution »

Failed Predictions and Common Descent: Part V

On this episode of ID the Future, Paul Nelson concludes his series on common descent. Nelson and Luskin take a look at a recent paper addressing phylogenies and data which seems to conflict with common descent.

Nelson recommends weighing Darwinism’s claims with significant skepticism and moving from public rhetoric into the actual practice of the science. Dr. Nelson illustrates how evolution’s unequivocal, forceful claims give way to much more interesting science where people are struggling with real data and carefully listening to the evidence.

play_button.gif Click here to listen

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.discovery.org/scripts/mt/mt-tb.cgi/2481