> Michael Behe
> William Dembski
> Guillermo Gonzalez
> Steve Meyer
> Paul Nelson
> Jay Richards
> Jonathan Wells
> Jonathan Witt



Send an email to us at:
idthefuture@discovery.org



> Delving Into Science at Cambridge: Stephen C. Meyer and Signature in the Cell, Part 2
> The Making of an ID Theorist: Stephen C. Meyer and the Origin of Life
> Matter and the Mind: Part Three With UK Darwin-Doubter James LeFanu
> Rediscovering the Mystery of Ourselves: Part Two With Science Writer James LeFanu
> Darwin Doubting in the UK: Columnist, Doctor and Author James LeFanu
> PSSI International Adventures With Darwinists in Spain, Part Two
> Physicians and Surgeons for Scientific Integrity, Part One
> When Athens Met Jerusalem With John Mark Reynolds
> Benjamin Wiker on Darwin, the Man and the Myth
> The Line Through the Heart: Natural Law and J. Budziszewski

Dotted Divider Line

« Failed Predictions and Common Descent: Part IV | Main | New Textbook Promotes Better Teaching of Evolution »

Failed Predictions and Common Descent: Part V

On this episode of ID the Future, Paul Nelson concludes his series on common descent. Nelson and Luskin take a look at a recent paper addressing phylogenies and data which seems to conflict with common descent.

Nelson recommends weighing Darwinism’s claims with significant skepticism and moving from public rhetoric into the actual practice of the science. Dr. Nelson illustrates how evolution’s unequivocal, forceful claims give way to much more interesting science where people are struggling with real data and carefully listening to the evidence.

play_button.gif Click here to listen

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.discovery.org/scripts/mt/mt-tb.cgi/2481