> Michael Behe
> William Dembski
> Guillermo Gonzalez
> Steve Meyer
> Paul Nelson
> Jay Richards
> Jonathan Wells
> Jonathan Witt



Send an email to us at:
idthefuture@discovery.org



> Who Designed the Designer?
> PBS' Think Tank Video Explaining Differences Between Intelligent Design and Creationism
> Atheist Antithesis
> Another Look at The Devil’s Delusion
> Thomas Jefferson and Intelligent Design
> Alfred Russel Wallace: Champion of Natural Selection or Intelligent Design?
> The Current State of Origins of Life Research
> ID and the Arts, Part II
> Intelligent Design and the Arts
> Guillermo Gonzalez Interview

Dotted Divider Line

« Failed Predictions and Common Descent: Part IV | Main | New Textbook Promotes Better Teaching of Evolution »

Failed Predictions and Common Descent: Part V

On this episode of ID the Future, Paul Nelson concludes his series on common descent. Nelson and Luskin take a look at a recent paper addressing phylogenies and data which seems to conflict with common descent.

Nelson recommends weighing Darwinism’s claims with significant skepticism and moving from public rhetoric into the actual practice of the science. Dr. Nelson illustrates how evolution’s unequivocal, forceful claims give way to much more interesting science where people are struggling with real data and carefully listening to the evidence.

play_button.gif Click here to listen

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.discovery.org/scripts/mt/mt-tb.cgi/2481