> Michael Behe
> William Dembski
> Guillermo Gonzalez
> Steve Meyer
> Paul Nelson
> Jay Richards
> Jonathan Wells
> Jonathan Witt



Send an email to us at:
idthefuture@discovery.org



> How David Berlinski Became a Scientific Critic
> The Religious Foundations of Darwinism and the Failure of Naturalism
> Intelligently Designed Nanotechnology
> Darwin's Predictions With Cornelius Hunter
> In a Charitable Mood: David Berlinski Reviews Richard Dawkins' The Greatest Show on Earth
> The Real Frankenstein: Giovanni Aldini
> Darwinists Launch Cyber Attack on Intelligent Design Conference Website
> David Berlinski and The Deniable Darwin
> The Origins of Intelligent Design: Countering Darwinist Urban Legends
> A Skeptic's Take on the New Atheists: An Interview With The Devil's Delusion Author David Berlinski

Dotted Divider Line

« A Discussion of the Montana Law Review's Recent Publication of Articles about the Dover Intelligent Design Ruling | Main | Legacy of Learning: An Interview with Dr. Lyle Jensen, Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (Part Two). »

Decent Dissent: Seeking an Open Evolution Debate
Robert Crowther

In this installment of ID The Future, Gonzaga Law School professor David K. DeWolf discusses the ongoing battle between Darwinism and intelligent design as it resonates through education, politics, and recent presidential debates. DeWolf argues that, rather than unfairly framing the evolution debate or denying tenure to pro-intelligent design college professors, personal agendas should be dismissed so both sides of the issue can be critically investigated.

DeWolf's comments first appeared on June 11th in The Boston Globe.

play_button.gif Click here to listen.

Posted by Robert Crowther on June 22, 2007 5:44 PM |

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.discovery.org/scripts/mt/mt-tb.cgi/2570