> Michael Behe
> William Dembski
> Guillermo Gonzalez
> Steve Meyer
> Paul Nelson
> Jay Richards
> Jonathan Wells
> Jonathan Witt



Send an email to us at:
idthefuture@discovery.org



> How David Berlinski Became a Scientific Critic
> The Religious Foundations of Darwinism and the Failure of Naturalism
> Intelligently Designed Nanotechnology
> Darwin's Predictions With Cornelius Hunter
> In a Charitable Mood: David Berlinski Reviews Richard Dawkins' The Greatest Show on Earth
> The Real Frankenstein: Giovanni Aldini
> Darwinists Launch Cyber Attack on Intelligent Design Conference Website
> David Berlinski and The Deniable Darwin
> The Origins of Intelligent Design: Countering Darwinist Urban Legends
> A Skeptic's Take on the New Atheists: An Interview With The Devil's Delusion Author David Berlinski

Dotted Divider Line

« Interview with Dr. Lyle Jensen, Part One | Main | Decent Dissent: Seeking an Open Evolution Debate »

A Discussion of the Montana Law Review's Recent Publication of Articles about the Dover Intelligent Design Ruling

On this episode of ID The Future, CSC's Casey Luskin discusses with senior fellow David DeWolf the current issue of the Montana Law Review which features a lively exchange of views about the Kitzmiller v. Dover intelligent design decision. The Kitzmiller decision isn’t wearing well even among legal scholars who are critical of intelligent design, and Irons' article does little to seriously defend Judge Jones' ruling.

The lead article on the Dover decision (“Intelligent Design Will Survive Kitzmiller v. Dover”) was co-authored by David DeWolf, John West, and Casey Luskin. A second article by Peter Irons (“Disaster in Dover”) responds to the first article, followed by a short rebuttal by DeWolf, West, and Luskin.

play_button.gif Click here to listen.

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.discovery.org/scripts/mt/mt-tb.cgi/2548

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference A Discussion of the Montana Law Review's Recent Publication of Articles about the Dover Intelligent Design Ruling:

» ID? Not the Future. from hell's handmaiden
Robert Crowther, writing for the Discovery Institute’s ID the Future blog, pointed me to an interesting paper by Peter Irons. A little background… Shortly after the Dover trial in which Judge Jones issued what has been called the Kitzmille... [Read More]