Send an email to us at:
idthefuture@discovery.org



> William Dembski's Advice for Young Intelligent Design Scientists
> The Best Way to Teach Evolution: Treat It Like Science
> Caroline Crocker Explains the Need for Scientific Integrity
> The Real Story of How Caroline Crocker Was Expelled from George Mason University
> Evidence for Intelligent Design
> ID The Future Video Podcast: Biological Information and the Origin of Life featuring Dr. Stephen Meyer
> Setting the Record Straight with Caroline Crocker
> The Design Argument Is Unrefuted: Stephen Meyer Responds to Critics In Signature in the Cell, Part 4
> DNA Evidence for Design: Stephen C. Meyer and Signature in the Cell, Part 3
> Delving Into Science at Cambridge: Stephen C. Meyer and Signature in the Cell, Part 2

Dotted Divider Line

« Interview with Dr. Lyle Jensen, Part One | Main | Decent Dissent: Seeking an Open Evolution Debate »

A Discussion of the Montana Law Review's Recent Publication of Articles about the Dover Intelligent Design Ruling

On this episode of ID The Future, CSC's Casey Luskin discusses with senior fellow David DeWolf the current issue of the Montana Law Review which features a lively exchange of views about the Kitzmiller v. Dover intelligent design decision. The Kitzmiller decision isn't wearing well even among legal scholars who are critical of intelligent design, and Irons' article does little to seriously defend Judge Jones' ruling.

The lead article on the Dover decision ("Intelligent Design Will Survive Kitzmiller v. Dover") was co-authored by David DeWolf, John West, and Casey Luskin. A second article by Peter Irons ("Disaster in Dover") responds to the first article, followed by a short rebuttal by DeWolf, West, and Luskin.

play_button.gif Click here to listen.

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.idthefuture.com/scripts/mt/mt-tb.cgi/2548

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference A Discussion of the Montana Law Review's Recent Publication of Articles about the Dover Intelligent Design Ruling:

» ID? Not the Future. from hell's handmaiden
Robert Crowther, writing for the Discovery Institute’s ID the Future blog, pointed me to an interesting paper by Peter Irons. A little background… Shortly after the Dover trial in which Judge Jones issued what has been called the Kitzmille... [Read More]