> Michael Behe
> William Dembski
> Guillermo Gonzalez
> Steve Meyer
> Paul Nelson
> Jay Richards
> Jonathan Wells
> Jonathan Witt



Send an email to us at:
idthefuture@discovery.org



> Who Designed the Designer?
> PBS' Think Tank Video Explaining Differences Between Intelligent Design and Creationism
> Atheist Antithesis
> Another Look at The Devil’s Delusion
> Thomas Jefferson and Intelligent Design
> Alfred Russel Wallace: Champion of Natural Selection or Intelligent Design?
> The Current State of Origins of Life Research
> ID and the Arts, Part II
> Intelligent Design and the Arts
> Guillermo Gonzalez Interview

Dotted Divider Line

« Examining Von Baer's Law | Main | Failed Predictions and Common Descent: Part II »

Failed Predictions and Common Descent: Part I

This episode of ID the Future features the first of a series of interviews with Dr. Paul Nelson on common descent.

Casey Luskin of the CSC asks Dr. Nelson a series of illuminating questions: Is intelligent design compatible with common descent? What is his view of common descent, and how is it related to the origin of life? As the theory of common descent does not tell us whether or not the tree of life was designed, there are design theorists on both sides of this debate. Listen in as Dr. Nelson gives his analysis of the evidence for common ancestry and how the theory is affected by failed predictions.


play_button.gif Click here to listen.

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.discovery.org/scripts/mt/mt-tb.cgi/2325