> Michael Behe
> William Dembski
> Guillermo Gonzalez
> Steve Meyer
> Paul Nelson
> Jay Richards
> Jonathan Wells
> Jonathan Witt



Send an email to us at:
idthefuture@discovery.org



> How David Berlinski Became a Scientific Critic
> The Religious Foundations of Darwinism and the Failure of Naturalism
> Intelligently Designed Nanotechnology
> Darwin's Predictions With Cornelius Hunter
> In a Charitable Mood: David Berlinski Reviews Richard Dawkins' The Greatest Show on Earth
> The Real Frankenstein: Giovanni Aldini
> Darwinists Launch Cyber Attack on Intelligent Design Conference Website
> David Berlinski and The Deniable Darwin
> The Origins of Intelligent Design: Countering Darwinist Urban Legends
> A Skeptic's Take on the New Atheists: An Interview With The Devil's Delusion Author David Berlinski

Dotted Divider Line

« One Doctor's Journey to Becoming a Darwin Doubter | Main | Artist Shows Connections Between Nature and Human Design »

Double-Standards in Scientific Journals

This episode of ID the Future features a clip of Discovery senior fellow Paul Nelson speaking at the 2006 ID Under Fire conference on the double-standard of ID in scientific journals. Dr. Nelson tells the story of how critics of intelligent design fault it for being merely a "religious idea," then proceed to respond to the scientific case made by biochemist Michael Behe.

The full video of this conference, Intelligent Design Under Fire: Experts Cross-Examine the Top Proponents of Intelligent Design Theory, is available from the Access Research Network .

play_button.gif Click here to listen.

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.discovery.org/scripts/mt/mt-tb.cgi/2047