Send an email to us at:
idthefuture@discovery.org



> William Dembski's Advice for Young Intelligent Design Scientists
> The Best Way to Teach Evolution: Treat It Like Science
> Caroline Crocker Explains the Need for Scientific Integrity
> The Real Story of How Caroline Crocker Was Expelled from George Mason University
> Evidence for Intelligent Design
> ID The Future Video Podcast: Biological Information and the Origin of Life featuring Dr. Stephen Meyer
> Setting the Record Straight with Caroline Crocker
> The Design Argument Is Unrefuted: Stephen Meyer Responds to Critics In Signature in the Cell, Part 4
> DNA Evidence for Design: Stephen C. Meyer and Signature in the Cell, Part 3
> Delving Into Science at Cambridge: Stephen C. Meyer and Signature in the Cell, Part 2

Dotted Divider Line

« One Doctor's Journey to Becoming a Darwin Doubter | Main | Artist Shows Connections Between Nature and Human Design »

Double-Standards in Scientific Journals

This episode of ID the Future features a clip of Discovery senior fellow Paul Nelson speaking at the 2006 ID Under Fire conference on the double-standard of ID in scientific journals. Dr. Nelson tells the story of how critics of intelligent design fault it for being merely a "religious idea," then proceed to respond to the scientific case made by biochemist Michael Behe.

The full video of this conference, Intelligent Design Under Fire: Experts Cross-Examine the Top Proponents of Intelligent Design Theory, is available from the Access Research Network .

play_button.gif Click here to listen.

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.idthefuture.com/scripts/mt/mt-tb.cgi/2047