Send an email to us at:
idthefuture@discovery.org



> William Dembski's Advice for Young Intelligent Design Scientists
> The Best Way to Teach Evolution: Treat It Like Science
> Caroline Crocker Explains the Need for Scientific Integrity
> The Real Story of How Caroline Crocker Was Expelled from George Mason University
> Evidence for Intelligent Design
> ID The Future Video Podcast: Biological Information and the Origin of Life featuring Dr. Stephen Meyer
> Setting the Record Straight with Caroline Crocker
> The Design Argument Is Unrefuted: Stephen Meyer Responds to Critics In Signature in the Cell, Part 4
> DNA Evidence for Design: Stephen C. Meyer and Signature in the Cell, Part 3
> Delving Into Science at Cambridge: Stephen C. Meyer and Signature in the Cell, Part 2

Dotted Divider Line

« Darwinian Evolution is Being Overhyped as the Cornerstone of the Biological Sciences | Main | Scientific Research Projects from an Intelligent Design Perspective »

Is Dogmatic Darwinism a Science Stopper?

On this episode of ID The Future CSC's Robert Crowther examines whether intelligent design is an impediment to scientific progress, and says the answer is an emphatic no.

According to Crowther, Darwinists making this claim are mistaken. Such as a recent Sky & Telescope blog post that stated: Intelligent design basically tells us to stop investigating the natural world, because when we hit a brick wall in our knowledge, we can find the answers in god. ... and ... Intelligent design, on the other hand, stifles our perseverance because it says that answers to the great questions have already been handed to us on a silver platter. Listen in to find out why this just isn't so.

play_button.gif Click here to listen.

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.idthefuture.com/scripts/mt/mt-tb.cgi/1880