> Michael Behe
> William Dembski
> Guillermo Gonzalez
> Steve Meyer
> Paul Nelson
> Jay Richards
> Jonathan Wells
> Jonathan Witt



Send an email to us at:
idthefuture@discovery.org



> The ID Debate at Utah Valley State College This Friday (Dec 1)
> Not by chance: From bacterial propulsion systems to human DNA, evidence of intelligent design is everywhere
> DNA and Other Designs
> In That Stack of Papers, A Quiet Revolution
> Great...now aliens will NEVER visit Earth.
> The Design Revolution - Chapter 33: Design by Elimination or Design by Comparison
> Michael Ruse, Crossdresser
> Design & Evolution in the Big Easy: Loyola University New Orleans President's Forum on ID Next Week
> Thomas Nagel Critiques Dawkins: The Design-Cannot-Possibly-Be-True Argument
> The Hits Just Keep on Coming

Dotted Divider Line

« UC-Irvine Colloquium on Design & Evolution (May 10, 2006) | Main | They Said No Thanks, Not Interested »

Why Didn't the New Dover Board Try to Save Dover Voters a Million Dollars by Repealing the ID Policy?

At Evolution News, Michael Francisco responds to critics who claim the newly elected anti-ID Dover School Board had no chance of saving Dover taxpayers a million dollars by repealing the ID policy before Judge Jones issued his decision. After citing ample court precedent suggesting that their repealing the policy may indeed have mooted the case and saved Dover a million dollars in ACLU attorney fees, Francisco asks:


If there was nothing to be lost by rescinding the policy, would not even a slight chance of success have led a prudent school board to take advantage of the opportunity? Their choice resulted in an absolute guarantee that if the ID policy were struck down, then the Dover Area School District would be obliged to pay $1 million dollars in attorneys’ fees.

Francisco's full analysis is here.

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.discovery.org/scripts/mt/mt-tb.cgi/808