> Michael Behe
> William Dembski
> Guillermo Gonzalez
> Steve Meyer
> Paul Nelson
> Jay Richards
> Jonathan Wells
> Jonathan Witt



Send an email to us at:
idthefuture@discovery.org



> Michael Ruse, Crossdresser
> Design & Evolution in the Big Easy: Loyola University New Orleans President's Forum on ID Next Week
> Thomas Nagel Critiques Dawkins: The Design-Cannot-Possibly-Be-True Argument
> The Hits Just Keep on Coming
> Biogeography
> Does George Smoot, Nobel Laureate, See Physical Evidence of Design in the Cosmos?
> This is your brain on materialism
> Biological Design Research: The Bat's Intercept and the Moth's ECM
> The Design of DNA Compaction
> This Must be a Parallel Universe

Dotted Divider Line

« Nelson discussion paper for Sarkar / Nelson debate | Main | An Interview with David Berlinski: Part Two »

Intelligent Design Roundup

Lawrence Selden analyzes a recent Zogby poll on teaching the controversy, and also discusses Prior Commitments and the Evidence.

MikeGene clarifies some oft-mangled definitions here, and Paul discusses whether Dembski's triad is faulty here and here.

Tom Gilson discusses neural states and rationality and the non-material versus material mind. And Joe Carter asks (and answers), "Who are the heirs of the Enlightenment?" He also reports on "An Appearance of Being Pregnant."

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.discovery.org/scripts/mt/mt-tb.cgi/578